Just before 12:30 a.m. on Sunday, September 14, 2026, a 2019 McLaren 720S was stopped at the red light at Culver Drive and Deerfield Avenue in Irvine. When the light changed, the car accelerated explosively northbound. Seconds later, the driver lost control on the wet pavement, braked hard, veered right, and slammed into a tree. The impact split the supercar in two. Both occupants — later identified as James Wehr, 27, a well-known Orange County car influencer and founder of South OC Cars and Coffee, and his passenger, Alexis “Lexi” Kramer, 22, of Florida — were killed as the wreckage erupted in flames.
It is a tragedy by any measure. But the wreck also raises urgent legal questions that apply far beyond this particular case: when speed, alcohol, or drugs contribute to a fatal crash, what criminal exposure does a surviving driver face under California law? And what does a high-quality defense look like?
The Irvine Police Department’s Major Accident Investigation Team (MAIT) has confirmed that speed was a significant factor and that investigators will examine all possible contributing factors, including roadway conditions, vehicle mechanics, speed, and any factors that may have affected the driver’s operation of the McLaren. That last phrase — carefully chosen by law enforcement — is a reference to alcohol and drug impairment. Notably, Newport Beach Police had stopped the McLaren earlier that same evening and issued a warning to the driver before the fatal sequence of events unfolded.
WHAT CRIMINAL CHARGES CAN ARISE FROM A FATAL HIGH-SPEED CRASH?
California law draws important distinctions based on the degree of culpability involved. If an investigation reveals speed, impairment, or a combination of both, a surviving driver could face a range of serious felony charges.
Vehicular Manslaughter — Penal Code § 192(c)
California Penal Code § 192(c) covers unlawful killing in the driving of a vehicle. Gross vehicular manslaughter — the most serious subdivision — applies when a driver commits an unlawful act, or a lawful act with gross negligence, that causes death. Racing from a traffic signal at extreme speed on a wet road easily satisfies the gross negligence standard. A conviction carries up to six years in state prison.
DUI Causing Death — Vehicle Code § 23153
If toxicology results reveal that alcohol or drugs played a role, prosecutors can charge DUI causing death under Vehicle Code § 23153. This charge carries up to three years in state prison for each person killed. Prosecutors routinely stack this count alongside vehicular manslaughter, creating significant sentencing exposure.
Second-Degree Murder — The “Watson Murder” Doctrine
California’s most aggressive theory in fatal DUI crashes is implied malice murder under Penal Code § 187 — commonly called a “Watson murder” after the landmark 1981 California Supreme Court case People v. Watson. If a driver had previously been convicted of DUI, had been warned at sentencing about the dangers of drunk driving, and then drove impaired again and killed someone, prosecutors argue that the driver showed conscious disregard for human life. A Watson murder charge carries 15 years to life in state prison.
Exhibition of Speed — Vehicle Code § 23109
California Vehicle Code § 23109 makes it a misdemeanor — and under some circumstances a felony — to accelerate a vehicle in a manner that demonstrates speed competition. Rapid acceleration from a traffic signal, particularly in a supercar, is precisely the conduct this statute targets. It is frequently charged alongside more serious felonies to give prosecutors additional leverage.
WHY ARE SPEED CASES ARE ESPECIALLY COMPLEX TO DEFEND?
Speed-related fatalities generate intense public pressure on law enforcement and prosecutors. The visceral nature of a crash — a car split in two, a fireball, two lives cut short — can push investigators and district attorneys toward the most serious available charge rather than the most legally appropriate one. Video evidence, as exists in this case, can be compelling but also deceptive: what looks like recklessness on a dash cam may have an innocent explanation in vehicle dynamics, road conditions, or a sudden mechanical failure.
A skilled defense requires examining the accident reconstruction, challenging the methodology of speed estimates derived from surveillance or dash cam footage, scrutinizing the toxicology chain of custody, and exploring every alternative cause of the crash. These are not technicalities — they are the difference between a conviction for second-degree murder and a manslaughter conviction, or between a conviction and an acquittal.
HOW CAN WILLIAM M. WEINBERG HELP?
When someone faces criminal charges arising from a fatal traffic collision — whether it involves a supercar in Irvine or any vehicle anywhere in Orange County — the quality of their legal representation matters enormously. At the Law Offices of William M. Weinberg, we have spent decades defending clients against the most serious charges California prosecutors bring: DUI causing death, vehicular manslaughter, and Watson murder.
We begin every case with a thorough independent investigation. We retain respected accident reconstruction experts, toxicologists, and vehicle engineers who can independently evaluate the evidence — not accept the prosecution’s narrative at face value. We scrutinize police reports for inconsistencies, challenge improper stops and searches, and identify weaknesses in the chain of custody for blood or urine evidence. When appropriate, we negotiate aggressively with prosecutors for reduced charges or alternative sentencing. When the evidence demands it, we take cases to trial and fight to win.
Crashes like the one on Culver Drive remind us how quickly a single moment can change everything. If you or someone you love is under investigation or has been charged in connection with a fatal or serious accident in Orange County, do not wait. Early intervention by an experienced criminal defense attorney can be the most important decision you make.
Q: If I was driving fast but wasn’t drunk or on drugs, can I still be charged with a crime after a fatal crash in California?
Yes. Gross vehicular manslaughter under Penal Code § 192(c) does not require any alcohol or drug involvement. If a prosecutor can prove you drove with gross negligence — a reckless disregard for the safety of others — and that negligence caused a death, you can be charged with a felony carrying up to six years in prison. Excessive speed alone can satisfy gross negligence, especially in residential areas, at intersections, or on wet roads.
Q: What is a “Watson murder,” and could it apply to me?
A Watson murder is a second-degree murder charge brought against a driver who kills someone while driving under the influence when the driver previously received a DUI conviction and was formally warned that driving drunk or drugged could be treated as murder. Prosecutors use these advisements — called Watson advisements — that are routinely given at sentencing or upon a plea in DUI cases. If you have a prior DUI and a new DUI-related fatality, Watson murder is a very real possibility. The charge carries 15 years to life in state prison.
Q: How long does a MAIT investigation take before charges are filed?
Major Accident Investigation Team cases in California can take months before criminal charges are filed. Investigators typically wait for toxicology results (which can take 6–12 weeks or more), complete accident reconstruction, interview witnesses, and review all video evidence before submitting their findings to the District Attorney’s Office. This window of time is critically important. Retaining an attorney early — before charges are filed — allows your defense to conduct its own independent investigation while evidence is still fresh and witnesses are available.
Q: Can a defense attorney actually make a difference in a case where there is dash cam or surveillance video of the crash?
Absolutely. Video evidence is often less straightforward than it appears. The camera angle, frame rate, and compression all affect how speed and control appear on screen. A qualified accident reconstruction expert can often demonstrate that what looks catastrophic in a short video clip is consistent with a mechanical failure, a road hazard, or a speed far lower than what prosecutors allege. Additionally, even compelling video does not establish intoxication — that requires its own chain of evidence, which can be challenged independently.
Q: What should I do if police want to question me after a serious accident?
Say nothing beyond identifying yourself, and immediately contact a criminal defense attorney. This is not an overreaction — it is the single most important step you can take. Anything you say at the scene or in a follow-up police interview can and will be used against you. Officers are trained to gather statements quickly, often before a suspect fully appreciates their legal exposure. An experienced attorney can be present during questioning, advise you on your rights, and prevent the kind of self-incriminating statements that routinely turn an investigation into a prosecution.
Orange County DUI Lawyer Blog
